Developing robots for STEM education and proposing implementation plans in high schools
Corressponding author's email:
halm@hcmute.edu.vnKeywords:
STEM, teaching model, deployment and application solutions, high school studentsAbstract
In this paper, the authors developed robot models to attract high school students to familiarize themselves with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math). The objectives of the study focus on two main directions: (1) Complete and improve the effectiveness of STEM education Robot for high school students, (2) proposing implementation plans in high schools. The authors propose designing, building hardware and software programs for models in the form of modules that learners can practice assembling themselves, and learners can program the basic features on their own by this model. After the completion of hardware equipment, the authors develop the implementation plan at some high schools in Ho Chi Minh City.
Downloads: 0
References
Jane J. Lee "Obama's Budget Shuffles STEM Education Deck". American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2012
J.L. Irwin, D.E. Oppliger, J.M. Pearce, G. Anzalone, “Evaluation of RepRap 3D Printer Workshops in K-12 STEM”, 122nd ASEE Conf. Proceedings, paper ID 12036, 2015
Yu Xie, Michael Fang, and Kimberlee Shauman, "STEM Education", 2015
Vandell, D. L., “California afterschool outcome measures project: Field test of the online toolbox” (Final report submitted to the California Department of Education), 2012
https://floridapoly.edu/stem-education-florida-need-know/
https://marylandstemfestival.org/
https://blossomscholastic.org/cincinnati-camps/
Labor, United. “The STEM Workforce Challenge: The Role of the Public Workforce System in a National Solution for a Competitive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Workforce”, Federal Publications, 2007
Langdon, D. & McKittrick, G. & Beede, David & Khan, B. & Doms, M., “STEM: Good jobs now and for the future”, 2013
A. Khanlari. “Effects of educational robots on learning STEM and on students’ attitude toward stem.” In Conference on Engineering Education, pp. 62–66, 2013.
C. Kim, D. Kim, J. Yuan, R. Hill, P. Doshi, & C. Thai. “Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching.” Computers & Education, 91, 14–31, 2015
M. Karim, S. Lemaignan, & F. Mondada. “A review: Can robots reshape k-12 STEM education?” In International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, pp. 1–8, 2015.
W. Wang. “A mini experiment of offering STEM education to several age groups through the use of robots.” In 2016 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), pp. 120–127, 2016.
A. Cruz-Martín, J. A. Fernández-Madrigal, C. Galindo, J. González Jiménez, C. Stockmans-Daou, & J. L. Blanco-Claraco. “A lego mindstorms nxt approach for teaching at data acquisition, control systems engineering and real-time systems undergraduate courses.” Computers & Education, 59, 974–988, 2012.
F. Tuluri, J. Colonias, D. Vance, D. Dixon, M. White, & A. Edwards. “Robotics-based educational tool—An interactive learning platform to enhance understanding behavior of physical systems.” The Researcher, 27(1), 89–104, 2014.
F. Sullivana, & J. Heffernana. “Robotic construction kits as computational manipulatives for learning in the STEM disciplines.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 105–128, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © JTE.
