Analysis of parameters affecting the performance of optical camera communication system

Authors

  • Nguyon Duy Thong Quy Nhon University, Vietnam
  • Pham Van Khoa HCMC University of Technology and Education, Vietnam

Corressponding author's email:

nguyenduythong@qnu.edu.vn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.65.2021.136

Keywords:

Optical camera communication (OCC);, image sensor (IS), flickering, inter-frame gap (IFG), saturation

Abstract

Optical camera communication (OCC) system is a scheme that uses LED and an image sensor (IS) to transmit and receive signal. However, the applications of OCC are still limited due to low data rate and short transmission distance. To further enhance the system performance, this study will evaluate the parameters that affect the system performance. The experimental and analytical results show that flickering and inter-frame gap (IFG) significantly reduce the data rate of the system. Blooming phenomenon also causes the IFG to become wider, and affects the transmission distance. The light intensity of the transmitter needs to be considered to conform the lighting system and avoid the saturation problem. In this paper, the performent of system is compared with data rate of 1.8 kbps and 3.6 kbps. The experimental results show that there is a trade-off between data rate and transmission distance. Therefore, depending on the specific application, the parameters of the image sensor should be considered carefully and appropriately.

Downloads: 0

Download data is not yet available.

References

IEEE STANDARD ASSOCIATION, “802.15.7-2011 - IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks--Part 15.7: Short-Range Wireless Optical Communication Using Visible Light,” 2011.

C. Danakis, M. Afgani, G. Povey, I. Underwood, and H. Haas, “Using a CMOS camera sensor for visible light communication,” in 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops, GC Wkshps 2012, 2012, pp. 1244–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2012.6477759

Zhaocheng Wang; Qi Wang; Wei Huang; Zhengyuan Xu, "Optical Camera Communication: Modulation and System Design," IEEE, pp.291-35, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119331865.ch9

D. T. Nguyen, S. Park, Y. Chae, and Y. Park, “VLC/OCC Hybrid Optical Wireless Systems for Versatile Indoor Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 22371–22376, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898423

R. D. Roberts, “Undersampled frequency shift ON-OFF keying (UFSOOK) for camera communications (CamCom),” in Proceedings - 2013 Wireless and Optical Communications Conference, WOCC 2013, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WOCC.2013.6676454

V. P. Rachim and W. Chung, "Multilevel Intensity-Modulation for Rolling Shutter-Based Optical Camera Communication," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 903-906, May, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2018.2823784

K. Liang, C.-W. Chow, Y. Liu, and C.-H. Yeh, “Thresholding schemes for visible light communications with CMOS camera using entropy-based algorithms,” Opt. Express, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025641

Chi-Wai Chow, Chung-Yen Chen, Shih-Hao Chen, Visible light communication using mobile-phone camera with data rate higher than frame rate, Opt. Express, vol. 23 (20) (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.026080

Younus, Othman Isam et al. “The Utilization of Artificial Neural Network Equalizer in Optical Camera Communications.” Sensors, vol. 21,8 2826. 16 Apr. 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082826

Published

27-08-2021

How to Cite

[1]
Nguyễn Duy Thông and Phạm Văn Khoa, “Analysis of parameters affecting the performance of optical camera communication system”, JTE, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 46–53, Aug. 2021.