The Impact of a Short-Term Workshop on Students’ Intention to Use 3D Printing Technology in Education: A Case Study

Online First: 12/05/2026

Authors

Corressponding author's email:

hoaqm.hcmue@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.2026.2121

Keywords:

Awareness, Pedagogy, STEM education, Technological competence, Tinkercad

Abstract

3D printing technology has increasingly been applied across various domains of everyday life; however, it still faces certain limitations in educational contexts. Therefore, greater attention should be given to enhancing the intention to use this technology among students in education-related majors. To address this need, this study designed a short-term workshop on the application of 3D printing technology in education and examined its impact on a sample of 30 students studying in Ho Chi Minh City. The results show that the workshop not only helped students develop more positive perceptions of 3D printing technology but also increased their intention to use this technology in the future. In addition, students were able to initially apply this technology to design simple educational activities related to their academic disciplines and provided positive feedback on the workshop. However, they also encountered several challenges, including limited design skills and the insufficient availability of 3D printers during the workshop. These findings suggest the need for further studies to develop high-quality, long-term training programs with adequate infrastructural support in order to optimize learning outcomes for students.

Downloads: 0

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Minh Hoa Quan, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan

Minh Hoa Quan received his bachelor’s degree in Physics Teacher Education and his master’s degree in Education Science from Ho Chi Minh City University of Education in 2021 and 2025, respectively. Since 2025, he has been a PhD candidate in the International Graduate Program of Education and Human Development at National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan. His research interests include science education, STEM education, education for sustainable development, and the integration of technology in teaching and learning. He also applies statistical analysis to investigate educational phenomena, identify factors that influence student learning, and develop assessment tools for evaluating student competencies.  He has published over ten academic papers and four books in recognized national journals and publishers, and actively engages in both national and international conferences and seeks research collaborations as well as supports student research development. His long-term goal is to apply these research interests to support students as well as pre-service and in-service teachers in accessing more equitable and high-quality education.

Email: hoaqm.hcmue@gmail.com. ORCID:  https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3152-4818

References

S. Ford and T. Minshall, “Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 25, pp. 131–150, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028

M. Tejera, S. Galiç, and Z. Lavicza, “3D Modelling and Printing in Teacher Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. STEM Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s41979-025-00147-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00147-2

Ministry of Education and Training, “General education program issued with Circular 32/2018/TT-BGDĐ,” 2018.

M. D. Tang, V. T. Pham, and T. N. Nguyen, “Proposing a Teaching Process for the Topic ‘Geometric Solids in Real-life Contexts’ in Lower Secondary Education with the Support of 3D Printing Technology,” (in Vietnamese), Vietnam J. Educ., vol. 24, no. 17, 2024.

D. M. P. Nguyen and T. M. N. Pham, “Applying 3D Printing Technology to Support Teaching the Topic ‘Volume of Solids of Revolution’ in Grade 12 Mathematics,” (in Vietnamese), Vietnam J. Educ., vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 1–6, 2023.

M. H. Quan, L. D. Nguyen, T. N. Nguyen, and T. K. A. Nguyen, “Integrating Tinkercad into the designing solution phase of STEM educational activities: A case study in Vietnam,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Digital Learning Strategies and Applications (DLSA), Taipei, Taiwan, May 2024.

A. Arslan and I. Erdogan, “Use of 3D Printers for Teacher Training and Sample Activities,” Int. J. Progress. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 343–360, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.22

H. Güleryüz, “Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers on the Use of 3D Printing with Tinkercad in Science Education,” Eur. J. Math. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 217–228, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.12973/ejmse.4.4.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.4.4.217

E. Novak and S. Wisdom, “Effects of 3D Printing Project-based Learning on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Science Attitudes, Science Content Knowledge, and Anxiety About Teaching Science,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 412–432, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5

N. Ali, D. Cairns, M. S. Khine, and M. Demirbilek, “A case study of preparing Emirati pre-service teachers to integrate 3D printing into teaching and learning,” in Integrating 3D Printing into Teaching and Learning: Practitioners’ Perspectives, N. Ali and M. S. Khine, Eds. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 2020, pp. 228–247, doi:10.1163/9789004415133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415133_012

M. Üçgül and S. Altıok, “The perceptions of prospective ICT teachers towards the integration of 3D printing into education and their views on the 3D modeling and printing course,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 10151–10181, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11593-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11593-z

A. Barbosa, I. Vale, and D. Alvarenga, “The use of Tinkercad and 3D printing in interdisciplinary STEAM education: A focus on engineering design,” STEM Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 222–246, 2024, doi: 10.3934/steme.2024014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024014

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 8th ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

A. Branko, A. Šorgo, C. Helm, R. Weinhandl, and V. Lang, “Exploring Factors Affecting Elementary School Teachers’ Adoption of 3D Printers In Teaching,” TechTrends, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 990–1006, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11528-023-00909-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00909-y

P. Holzmann, E. J. Schwarz, and D. B. Audretsch, “Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 259–275, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10961-018-9693-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9693-1

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1,” MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

M. Schmid, E. Brianza, and D. Petko, “Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model,” Comput. Educ., vol. 157, p. 103967, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967

C. O. Fritz, P. E. Morris, and J. J. Richler, “Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation.,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0024338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

Published

12-05-2026

How to Cite

[1]
Quản Minh Hòa, “The Impact of a Short-Term Workshop on Students’ Intention to Use 3D Printing Technology in Education: A Case Study: Online First: 12/05/2026”, JTE, May 2026.