Instructional design and engaging pedagogical principle into the building e-learning content
Corressponding author's email:
tapchikhgkdt@hcmute.edu.vnKeywords:
e-Learning, instructional design, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, knowlegde graphAbstract
Instructional design has being considered and applied in building e-Learning systems right from the early history of its developing literature. Thank to these applications, the e-Learning systems have combined the design of learning contents with the selection and use of technologies effectively. Recently, instructional design is more interested in e-Learning fields because the needs of developing system which used to serve in the educating and training problem are increasing. It leads to many researches to solve the existed limitations of on-line learning and teaching as well as improve the quality of e-Learning system.
The paper presents a general review of instructional design field and the use of the instructional design models for developing e-Learning systems now, especially focusing on the problems that related to building on-line learning content. In each section, the paper discusses the main objects and disadvantages to solving, in which the key point is the need of engaging pedagogical principle into building learning content process. The end of paper also introduces shortly Knowledge Graph, a model proposed by the paper authors. It aimed to engaging pedagogical principle into process of designing and building on-line learning content
Downloads: 0
References
ADL - Advanced Distributed Learning (2004), Overview. In Sharable Content Object Reference Model, 2nd Ed. [on- line]. Available: http://www.aldnet.gov/ downloads/70cfm.
Ball, D.L., Mc Diarmid, G.W. (1990)The subject matter prepation of teachers.In W.R. Houston, M. Haberman & J.Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of Research onTeacher Education, p.437-449, New York:Macmillan
Ball, D. L., Bass, H. (2000) Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Bates, A. W. (2005) Technology, e-learning and distance education (2nd Ed). New York: Rouledge Falmer Studies in Distance Education.
Broderick, C. L. (2001) What is instructional design?, [on-line]. Available: http://www.oocities.com/ok_bcurt/ whatisID.htm.
Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J. (2001) “The Systematic Design of Instruction (5thEd.). New York: Longman.
Duffy, T. M., Jonassen, D. H. (1991) Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology?, Education Technology, Volumn 31, Issue 5, 7-12.
Duval, E., Hodgins, W. (2003) A LOM Research Agenda. In Proceedings of WWW2003 – Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, Hungari.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., Wager, W. W. (1992) Principles of Instructional Design (4th Ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich College Publishers.
Gibbons, A. S., Nelson, J., Richards,R. (2002) The nature and origin of instructional objects. In The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, edited by D. A. Wiley, pp. 25-58, Bloomington, IN:AECT.
Grossman, P. (1989) A study of constract. Sources of pedagogical content knowledge or secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 24-32.
Grossman, P. (1990) The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1988) Knowledge use among experienced teacher: four case studies of high school teaching. Unpublished dissertation, Standford University, Standford, USA.
Gustafson, K. L., Branch, R.M. (2002) What is instructional design?, In Reiser, R, A. and Dempsey, J. V. (ed’s) Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Columbus: OH, Merrill Prentice Hall.
Herridge Group Inc (2004) The Use of Traditional Instructional Systems Design Models for e-Learning, [on-line]. Available: www.herridgegroup.com.
Hodgins, W. (2001) Get R.E.A.L”(Relevant Effective Adaptive Learning, TECHLEARN.
Hodgins, W. (2001) The future of learning objects. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version [on-line]. Available: http:// www.reusability.org/read/
Hodgins, W. (2006) C-ing the Future. The coming convergence of: Content, Competencies and Context.
Horton, W. (1994) Design and Writing Online Documentation: Hypermedia for Self-Supporting Products. 2nd Edition. Published by Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Horton, W. (2006) E-Learning by Design. Published by Pfeifer, an Imprint of Wiley.
IEEE (2005) The Learning Object Metadata Standard. Piscataway, New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ Learning Technology Standards Committee.
IHEP - Institute for Higher Education Policy (2001), Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education, [Online]. Available: http://www.ihep.com/PUB.htm.
Kanuka, H. (2006) Instructional Design and e-Learning: A Discussion of Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a Missing Construct, e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), Vol 9. No.2.
Kanuka, H., Anderson, T. (1999) Using Constructivism in Technology-Mediated Learning-Constructing Order out of the Chaos in the Literature”. Radical Pedagogy, 2(1).
Kenny, R. F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R. A., Campbell, K. (2005) A review of what instructionaldesigndo: Questions answered and Questions not asked, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31 (1), 9-26.
Le, L.-D., Nguyen, T.-D., Tran, V.-H., Hunger, A. (2008) e-Course and its Applications in Blended-Learning Environment.InProceedingsofInternational conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE), Nevada, USA, pp 89-95
Le, L.-D., Nguyen, T.-A., Nguyen, T.-D., Hunger, A. (2009), Building learner profile in Adaptive e-Learning Systems, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on e-Learning (ICEL 2009) 15-17, July 2009 , Torronto, Canada, pp 294-304.
Le, L.-D., Nguyen, T.-A., Nguyen, T.-D., Tran, V.-H., Hunger, A. (2010) Applying Pedagogical Analyses to Create an On- line Course for e Learning. In proceedings published by Springer-Verlag in Lecture Notes in AI as part of the LNCS/LNAI series. The 14th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems (KES 2010), 8-10th, Sep 2010, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
LTSC, (2000) Learning Technology Standards Committee Website [on-line]. Available: http://ltsc.ieee.org/.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., Borko, H. (1999) Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome and N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knownledge, p.95- 132, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Means, B. et al. (2009) Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, Final Report of US Department of Education.
Merrill, M. D. (1998) Knowledge Objects, CBT Solutions, [on-line]. Available: http://mdavidmerrill.com/ Papers/KnowledgeObjects.PDF, March/ April, 1-11.
Minedu - New Zealand Education Website, Ministry of Education (2009) What is e-Learning?, [on-line]. Available: http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation. aspx.
Morrison, G., Ross, S., Kemp, J. (2001) Designing Effective Instruction, (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Naidu, S. (2006) E-Learning: A Guidbook of Principles, Procedures and Practices, Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia (CEMCA), in press.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999) What is instructional design theory and how is it changing?. In Instructional design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of intructional theory (5-29), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Reiser, R. A. (2001) A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49 (2), p.57-67.
Roblyer, M. D. (2003) Integrating educational technology into teaching, 3rd Ed., Upper Saddle River, New York: Merill Prentice-Hall.
SCORM 2004 3rd Edition Overview Version 1.0, [on-line]. Available: http:// www.adlnet.gov/
Seels, B., Glasgow, Z. (1998) Making Instructional Design Decisions (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice- Hall.
Shulman, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Havard Educational Review, 57(1), pp 1-22.
Sims, R.C., Koszalka, T.A. (2008) Competencies for the new-age instructional designer. In J. M. Spector (Ed.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
Smith, P. L., Ragan, T. J. (1993) Instructional Design, Second Edition, Upper Sadle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., Wiley Publishers.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson,M. J., Coulson, R. L. (1991) Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Vilaseca,J., Castillo, D. (2008) Economic efficiency of e-learning in higher education: An Industrial Approach, Intangible Capital, 4(3): 191-211– ISSN: 1697-9818.
Wiley, D. A. (2007) The Learning Objects Literature, [on-line]. Available: http://www.citeulike/org/user/open- content, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © JTE.
