Research and Simulation Using MPPT Fuzzy Logic Research Algorithm to Optimize PV Solar Power
Online First: 18/08/2026
Corressponding author's email:
hienlt@huit.edu.vnDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.2026.2010Keywords:
Photovoltaic (PV) system, Solar energy conversion efficiency, Power electronics (DC-DC converter), Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)Abstract
Research and Simulation Using the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Fuzzy Logic Algorithm to Optimize the Power of Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Arrays represents an advanced approach in solar energy optimization. The MPPT algorithm allows automatic adjustment of the PV array’s operating point to achieve maximum energy conversion under fluctuating sunlight and temperature conditions. By integrating a Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), the system processes input parameters such as voltage and current to determine the most efficient control signals. Compared to conventional methods like Perturb and Observe (P&O), the fuzzy-based MPPT provides faster response, reduced oscillations, and improved accuracy in identifying the optimal point. Simulation using MATLAB/Simulink enables evaluation and fine-tuning of controller performance under dynamic weather scenarios. The results demonstrate enhanced energy conversion efficiency, stability, and reliability, supporting the broader goal of developing intelligent, adaptive, and sustainable photovoltaic systems for modern renewable energy applications.
Downloads: 0
References
A. Ibnelouad, A. El Kari, H. Ayad, and M. Mjahed, “A comprehensive comparison of the classic and intelligent behavior MPPT techniques for PV systems,” in Proc. 14th Int. Multi-Conf. Syst., Signals Devices (SSD), Marrakech, Morocco, Mar. 2017, pp. 526–531, doi: 10.1109/SSD.2017.8166966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2017.8166966
B. Bendib, H. Belmili, and F. Krim, “A survey of the most used MPPT methods: Conventional and advanced algorithms applied for photovoltaic systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 45, pp. 637–648, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.009
S. Kumar, A. Dwivedi, and A. M. Tripathi, “Assessment of adaptive neural-fuzzy MPPT in photovoltaic grid connected system,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Commun., Security, Artif. Intell. (ICCSAI), Greater Noida, India, Apr. 2025, pp. 843–848, doi: 10.1109/ICCSAI64074.2025.11064585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSAI64074.2025.11064585
N. O. Adelakun, S. A. Omolola, and O. F. Ayanlowo, “Assessment of off-grid renewable energy in selected African countries,” Zenodo, 2024, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.14866962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5158175
R. Khan, L. Khan, S. Ullah, I. Sami, and J. S. Ro, “Backstepping based super-twisting sliding mode MPPT control with differential flatness oriented observer design for photovoltaic system,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 1543, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.3390/electronics9091543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091543
H. Bounechba, A. Bouzid, K. Nabti, and H. Benalla, “Comparison of perturb & observe and fuzzy logic in maximum power point tracker for PV systems,” Energy Procedia, vol. 50, pp. 677–684, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.083
A. Trivedi, A. Gupta, R. K. Pachauri, and Y. K. Chauhan, “Comparison of perturb & observe and ripple correlation control MPPT algorithms for PV array,” in Proc. IEEE 1st Int. Conf. Power Electron., Intell. Control Energy Syst. (ICPEICES), Delhi, India, Jul. 2016, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ICPEICES.2016.7853459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEICES.2016.7853459
A. Silva, M. Amaro, and J. Mirez, “Design of a fuzzy logic control system for a battery energy storage system in a photovoltaic power plant to enhance frequency stability,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 17, p. 4550, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18174550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174550
B. E. Elnaghi, A. M. Ismaiel, M. M. Ismail, H. A. Zedan, and A. A. Salem, “Experimental validation of an adaptive fuzzy logic controller for MPPT of grid connected PV system,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 27173, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10188-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10188-7
M. Y. Baramadeh, M. A. A. Abouelela, and S. M. Alghuwainem, “Maximum power point tracker controller using fuzzy logic control with battery load for photovoltaics systems,” Smart Grid Renew. Energy, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 163–181, 2021, doi: 10.4236/sgre.2021.1210010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2021.1210010
A. S. Samosir, H. Gusmedi, S. Purwiyanti, and E. Komalasari, “Modeling and simulation of fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) for PV application,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (IJECE), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1315–1323, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v8i3.pp1315-1323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i3.pp1315-1323
A. I. M. Ali, E. E. M. Mohamed, and A. R. Youssef, “MPPT algorithm for grid-connected photovoltaic generation systems via model predictive controller,” in Proc. 19th Int. Middle East Power Syst. Conf. (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, Dec. 2017, pp. 895–900, doi: 10.1109/MEPCON.2017.8301286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON.2017.8301286
S. Motahhir, A. El Hammoumi, and A. El Ghzizal, “Photovoltaic system with quantitative comparative between an improved MPPT and existing INC and P&O methods under fast varying of solar irradiation,” Energy Rep., vol. 4, pp. 341–350, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.04.003
A. Youssef, M. E. Telbany, and A. Zekry, “Reconfigurable generic FPGA implementation of fuzzy logic controller for MPPT of PV systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 82, pp. 1313–1319, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.093
L. N. Rao, R. Somalwar, H. Dalvi, S. Singh, and P. S. Subudhi, “Photovoltaic system for maximum power point tracking using hybrid firefly and perturbation and observation algorithm,” Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. (IJPEDS), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1121–1130, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i2.pp1121-1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v14.i2.pp1121-1130
P. Sahu, A. Sharma, and R. Dey, “Ripple correlation control maximum power point tracking for battery operated PV systems: A comparative analysis,” in Proc. IEEE Int. IOT, Electron. Mechatronics Conf. (IEMTRONICS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, Sept. 2020, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216414
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Technical Education Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © JTE.


