Structure and Procedure for Developing an Online Course

Authors

  • Chi P. Diep Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam
  • Giang T.L. Nguyen Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam
  • Nga T. Vo Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam

Corressponding author's email:

chidp@hcmute.edu.vn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54644/jte.62.2021.83

Keywords:

online teaching, synchronous learning, asynchronous learning, blended learning, online course

Abstract

Online teaching or e-learning allows learners to participate in a virtual classroom environment based on web and based on digital applications or digital tools, to interact with learning content and (possibly) with teacher and other peers from a long distance to achieve learning goals defined by their learning needs. The article provides some theoretical backgrounds of online teaching related to the advantages and limitations of online teaching, the forms of online teaching (synchronous learning, asynchronous learning, blended learning), structure of implementing an online course supporting dialogical and deep learning. The article also shares the experiences of Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education (HCMUTE) in implementing online teaching, especially asynchronous teaching on learning management systems (LMS, FHQLMS) and gives some recommendations for lecturers to improve the quality of organizing online courses. Based on the theoretical analysis method with the literature review and the synthesis of practical education experience from HCMUTE, a four-step and 5W-1H online course design process is suggested

Downloads: 0

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atan, H., Azli, N.A., Rahman, Z.A. and Idrus, R.M. (2002): Computers in Distance Education: Gender differences in self-perceived computer competencies. Learning, Media and Technology, 2(3), pp. 123-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165020270304

Arabasz, P., Boggs, R. & Baker, M. B. (2003): Highlights of E-Learning Support Practices. Educause Center for Applied Research Bulletin, 9.

Aarnio, H. & Enqvist, J. (2016): How does teacher education in virtual environments develop professional teacher’s expertise?. In: S.Saari&T.Varis (Eds.), Professional Growth (pp.145-164). Keuruu, Finnland: Otavan kirjapaino.

Bleed, R. (2001): A Hybrid Campus for a New Millennium. Educause Review, 36 (1). 16-24.

Bersin J. (2004). The Blended Learning Book. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Bostock, S.J. & Lizhi, W. (2005): Gender in student online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching. International, 42(1), pp. 73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500048978

Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2007): Principles of Effective Online Teaching. Informing Science Press, California.

Carville, S., & Mitchell, D. R. (2000): “It’s a bit like Star Trek’: The effectiveness of video conferencing. Innovations in Education & Training International, 37(1), 42–49. doi:10.1080/135580000362070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135580000362070

Chen, W., & You, M. (2007): The differences between the influences of synchronous and asynchronous modes on collaborative learning project of industrial design. In D. Schuler (Ed.), Online communities and social computing (pp. 275–283). Berlin Heidelberg : Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73257-0_31

Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Videoconferencing on-Line: Enhancing communication over the Internet. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 23–27. doi:10.2307/1176777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004023

Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. (2002): Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today,8 (6).

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005): Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction Is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education,19, 133–148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2

Ghirardini, B. (2011): E-learning methodologies, a guide for designing and developing e-learning courses. FAO Germany.

Han, H. (2013): Do nonverbal emotional cues matter? Effects of video casting in synchronous virtual classrooms. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 253–264. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.837718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.837718

Hrastinski, S. (2010): How do e-learners participate in synchronous online discussions? Evolutionary and social psychological perspectives. In N. Kock (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology and information systems research (pp. 119–147). US: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_6

Knox, D. M. (1997): A review of the use of video‐conferencing for actuarial education —a three‐year case study. Distance Education, 18(2), 225–235. doi:10.1080/0158791970180204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791970180204

Irani, L. (2004): Understanding gender and confidence in CS course culture. SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), pp. 195-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971371

Lawless, C. (2020): Synchrounous vs Asynchronous Learning: Which is Right for Your Learners?. Online: https://www.learnupon.com/blog/synchronous-learning-asynchronous-learning/ (retrieved: 25.10.2020).

Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. O. (2010). Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How to “be there” for distance learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mabrito, M. (2006): A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 93–107. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_4

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keagan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–29). New York: Routledge.

Moore, R. (2003). Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 31–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102238656

McSporran, M. & Young, S. (2001): Does gender matter in online learning?ALT-J, 9(2), pp. 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v9i2.12024

Popovic, A, Lindic J, Indihar Stemberger, M. & Jaklic, J. (2005): Web Triad: the Impact of Web Portals on Quality of Institutions of Higher Education - Case Study of Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Vol. 2. pp. 313-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/830

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007): Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ruhalahti, S. (2019): Redesigning a Pedagogical Model for Scaffolding Dialogical, Digital and Deep Learning in Vocational Teacher Education. Lapin Yliopisto University of Lapland.

Sacher, M., Sacher, M. & Vaughan, N. (2014): A blended approach to Canadian First Nation Eduacation. Proceedings of International Conference E-learning 2014, Portugal, 21-28.

Stern J. (2020): Introduction to Online Teaching and Learning. Online: http://www.wlac.edu/online/documents/otl.pdf (retrieved: 12.10.2020)

Sharma, S.K. & Kitchens, F.L. (2005): Web Services Architecture for M-Learning. Miller College of Business, Ball State University, USA.

Sambrook, S. (2003): E-learning in small organisations. Education + Training, 45(8/9), 506–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910310508892

Scholtz, B.; Kapeso, M. (2014): Acceptance and Success factors for M-learning of ERP systems curricula. Proceedings of International Conference E-learning 2014, Portugal, 37-45.

Tony Bates A.W. (2020): Teaching in a Digital Age – Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Online: (retrieved: 20.10.2020)

Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2014): Blending Online Asynchronous and Synchronous Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778

Downloads

Published

26-02-2021

How to Cite

[1]
C. P. Diep, G. T.L. Nguyen, and N. T. Vo, “Structure and Procedure for Developing an Online Course”, JTE, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 82–97, Feb. 2021.

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)